Skip to main content
Fig. 3 | BMC Global and Public Health

Fig. 3

From: The unintended consequences of inconsistent closure policies and mobility restrictions during epidemics

Fig. 3

A Fixing \(\lambda = 0.95\), we show the change in final epidemic size per community (community 1 on the left and 2 on the right) for different interventions (axes) and coupling strength (rows). B Fixing \(\rho = 0.02\), we repeat the experiment now varying the epidemic transmission rate (rows). Color scale goes from best outcome (eradication of epidemic) in dark blue, to no change in grey, to worst possible outcome (\(R(\infty ) = 1\)) in dark magenta. In both panels, we use a dashed area to highlight the regime of unintended consequences where a useful intervention in community 2 worsen the epidemic in community 1

Back to article page